🔗 Share this article

Commentators have alleged Germany’s chancellor, Friedrich Merz, of employing what they call “risky” discourse about immigration, following he called for “very large scale” removals of people from urban areas – and claimed that anyone with daughters would support his position.

Firm Response

Merz, who assumed power in May vowing to counter the growth of the extremist Alternative für Deutschland party, on Monday chastised a journalist who questioned whether he wished to modify his strict statements on migration from last week due to broad condemnation, or apologise for them.

“I am unsure if you have kids, and girls among them,” stated to the correspondent. “Speak with your female children, I expect you’ll get a very direct answer. I have nothing to take back; on the contrary I reiterate: we have to change certain things.”

Opposition Backlash

The left-leaning opposition alleged that Merz of taking a page from far-right organizations, whose claims that women and girls are being targeted by immigrants with abuse has become a international right-wing mantra.

Ricarda Lang, criticized the chancellor of promoting a dismissive comment for female youth that overlooked their actual societal issues.

“It is possible ‘the daughters’ are also fed up with Merz being interested about their freedoms and protection when he can leverage them to support his completely regressive approaches?” she stated on the platform X.

Security Focus

The chancellor stated his priority was “safety in public space” and emphasized that only when it could be ensured “will the established parties regain confidence”.

He faced criticism last week for remarks that opponents claimed implied that diversity itself was a problem in the nation’s metropolitan areas: “Certainly we continue to have this challenge in the cityscape, and for this reason the interior minister is now working to enable and carry out removals on a massive scale,” Merz said during a visit to Brandenburg state outside Berlin.

Racial Prejudice Concerns

The leader of the Greens in Brandenburg alleged that Merz of inciting discriminatory attitudes with his remark, which provoked minor demonstrations in various cities across Germany at the weekend.

“It is harmful when governing parties try to label people as a problem due to their physical characteristics or heritage,” Rostock said.

SPD politician Natalie Pawlik of the SPD, government allies in the current administration, said: “Immigration cannot be labeled negatively with reductive or populist quick fixes – such approaches split society more deeply and eventually assists the undesirable elements rather than encouraging resolutions.”

Electoral Background

The chancellor’s CDU/CSU bloc turned in a underwhelming 28.5 percent performance in the February general election against the anti-migrant, anti-Muslim Alternative für Deutschland with its record 20.8 percent result.

Since then, the right-wing party has matched with the CDU/CSU, even overtaking it in various opinion polls, in the context of public concerns around migration, lawlessness and economic slowdown.

Previous Positions

Friedrich Merz ascended to leadership of his party promising a tougher line on migration than former chancellor Merkel, opposing her the optimistic motto from the migrant crisis a ten years past and giving her partial accountability for the AfD’s strength.

He has promoted an sometimes more populist tone than the former chancellor, notoriously accusing “young pashas” for repeated vandalism on New Year’s Eve and refugees for occupying oral health consultations at the expense of local residents.

Electoral Preparations

The CDU gathered on Sunday and Monday to hash out a approach ahead of five state elections next year. The AfD maintains strong leads in multiple eastern areas, approaching a unprecedented 40 percent approval.

The chancellor maintained that his political group was united in barring collaboration in government with the far-right party, a stance commonly referred to as the “firewall”.

Internal Criticism

Nonetheless, the current opinion research has concerned certain party supporters, leading a few of party officials and advisers to propose in recent weeks that the firewall could be untenable and counterproductive in the future.

Those disagreeing maintain that provided that the 12-year-old AfD, which domestic security authorities have labelled as far-right, is able to snipe from the sidelines without having to make the hard choices governing requires, it will gain from the incumbent deficit affecting many western democracies.

Study Results

Academics in the country recently found that mainstream parties such as the CDU were progressively permitting the extremist to set the agenda, unintentionally validating their concepts and spreading them further.

While Friedrich Merz resisted using the term “protection” on this week, he asserted there were “fundamental differences” with the AfD which would make collaboration impossible.

“We accept this difficulty,” he stated. “From now on also demonstrate clearly and very explicit the far-right party’s beliefs. We will distinguish ourselves distinctly and unequivocally from them. {Above all